Windsor
Advocacy organizations won't appeal an Ontario court'sdecision to dismiss their Charter challenge of the province'slong-term care (LTC) law, which allows hospitals to move people into homes they didn't chooseor be charged $400 a day to remain inhospital.
Under Bill 7, people can be put in homes they don't choose, pay $400 a day to stay in hospital
Jennifer La Grassa · CBC News
·
Advocacy organizations won't appeal an Ontario court'sdecision to dismiss their Charter challenge of the province's long-term care (LTC) law, which allows hospitals to move people into homes they didn't chooseor be charged $400 a day to remain inhospital.
The case, launched by the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly (ACE) and the Ontario Health Coalition (OHC),was heard in the Superior Court of Justice in September.
The two parties argued Bill 7, the More Beds, Better Care Act,— which was passed in 2022 — violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms so the law should be overturned. The provincial government, however, maintains the lawisnecessary to free up much-needed hospital beds.
In mid-January, the court sided with the province and decided to dismiss the case.
In an interview with CBC News on Wednesday, Ontario Health Coalition executive director Natalie Mehra said OHCcan't afford the legal costs to appeal.
- Charter challenge of Ontario's controversial long-term care law thrown out by court
The OHC is paying the majority of legal fees in this case, of"close to $200,000," according to Mehra. She saidthey're still fundraising to pay it off.
She also said an appeal is always challenging to win.
"It's very disappointing and really heartbreaking," Mehra said.
"We know that patients really are suffering as a result of the coercion, trying to find somewhere to move from hospital into a long-term care home that is a decent home, that provides the care that they need, that is close to loved ones."
In the published decision from January, Justice Robert Centa saidthe law doesn't contravene the Charter. The bill"does not interfere with an ALC [alternate level of care] patient's 'right' to choose where they live," andthe $400 dailycharge for a continued hospital stayis "not coercive," Centa wrote.
Instead,Bill 7 has a "sufficiently important objective," the justice added.
"I found that the purpose of Bill 7 is to reduce the number of ALC patients in hospital who are eligible for admission toa long-term care home in order to maximize hospital resources for patients who need hospital-level care."
Mehra said ACE and the OHC were "shocked" by the ruling, especially the idea that a $400 daily charge isn't coercive.
"These are elderly patients, they're on fixed incomes,$400 a day is $12,000 a month—that is beyond the means of the vast majority of people in Ontario. Itreally means that they don't have a choice in our view."
An Ontario patient charged $26K under legislation
Since the law was implemented in 2022, CBC News has spoken with people who wereimpacted, includingMichele Campeau,whose elderly mom was charged $26,000 under the legislation last year. Campeau had refused to move her mom out of a Windsor hospital and into a long-term care home the family didn't want.
CBC News reached out this week to Campeau for comment, but hasn't heard back. When she last spoke to CBC News in January, Campeau said she wasn't planning to paythe fee and didn't agree with the court ruling.
Patients, their caregivers and seniors advocates have said the law isunfair and doesn't give elderly people, who might be in their final stage of life, the right to choose where they want to live.
- ExclusiveHer loved one got $5,200 bill related to long-term care law. Ontario repeatedly said no charges were reported
- 'I'm not paying it': Family furious over $400 a day hospital fine for not moving to LTC
Buthealth-care leaders who providedexpert evidenceduring the court casehave said the lawhelps free up hospital beds for people who need them.
A spokesperson for Ontario's minister of health previously told CBC News the law "ensures people across the province receive the care they need, in a setting that is right for them."
"Itfrees up hospital beds so that people waiting for surgeries can get them sooner. It eases pressures on crowded emergency departments by admitting patients sooner and it connects more people to the care they need when they need it."
'Ramp up our fight'
Despite the OHC'sdecision, Mehra saidthey're not giving up.
She said they will continue to advocate for patientsand"ramp up our fight" to get the provinceto prioritize the rights of elderly patients.
Beyond overturning the law, she said,they'll advocate for thegovernment to improve home care,increase capacity in hospitals and LTC homes,and move forward with building new and modern homes that people want to live in.
"The fact that the solution has been to target patients rather than to deal with the capacity issues in our health system ...it's wrong, it's morally wrong, to treat people at the end of their lives in that way," she said.
"We have to fight with everything we have to force political change."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jennifer La Grassa
Videojournalist
Jennifer La Grassa is a videojournalist at CBC Windsor. She is particularly interested in reporting on healthcare stories. Have a news tip? Email jennifer.lagrassa@cbc.ca
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices·
About CBC NewsCorrections and clarifications·Submit a news tip·
Related Stories
- Ontario moved 424 people into nursing homes they didn't choose